Page views

Ananda Marga Forum

All the letters on this blog are directly related with the teachings of Shrii Shrii Anandamurti ji Baba.To communicate with the editors of this forum or receive postings of this blog, email us at:



Just a reminder to be sure to subscribe to our two new blogsites:

For latest news click here Ananda Marga Universal

For latest news click here Ananda Marga News Bulletin

Or email us at:

And we will be sure to add you to the list.

In Him,


Present Day Karna in Our AM

Date: 03 Jul 2008 22:16:50 -0000 From: "Pramod Dev" To: Subject: Present Day Karna in Our AM Baba "Jiivant'a' nay theme tha'ka' bha'i..." (PS 176) Meaning: Life moves ceaselessly on, we are always dancing towards that formless Divine One. We did not come here to weep, we came here for rhythm and song. Baba, by Your divine grace, I have a strong desire to live and serve You. So I go on trampling all pessimism. On and on I move-- always singing Your divine name, Baba, Baba, Baba...
Namaskar, We all know that when Taraka Brahma manifests Himself on this earth then He comes with a distinct purpose. In particular, Sri Krsna designed the Mahabharat to teach the society: By this well-planned, historic event, Lord Krsna wanted to provide a practical demonstration from which everyone could learn, grow, & prosper. So indeed the Mahabharat was not an ordinary war but rather a pre-planned event by Lord Krsna Himself in which the characters were assigned particular roles-- and they acted accordingly. Baba says, "All the characters in the Maha'bha'rata, from beginning to end, were simply puppets on the stage. They were made to dance by the tricks of Lord Krs'n'a alone." (Disc MHB, p.35)
So Krsna made each character perform in a given manner. By this design, through each of the central figures of the Mahabharat, Lord Krsna instilled a special lesson for the society. Such is the speciality of the Mahabharat. For example: (A) To teach the society that one must not ask anything from Parama Purusa, Lord Krsna made the character-- Jayadrath. (B) And to show the humanity that teachers must not be unjust and partial towards their students, Krsna created the character-- Dronacarya. (C) To teach society that one must not be a goody-goody who fails to oppose sinners, Sri Krsna created the character-- Bhiisma. (D) And to demonstrate to the society that in the fight between good and evil the good side may also suffer some setbacks but even then they must persevere, Lord Krsna made the character-- Abhimanyu. Through each of these aforementioned roles, Lord Krsna is teaching the do's & don'ts of life, in the most practical way possible-- through a demonstration that everyone could see, feel, and touch. And such also is the case with the role of Karna also. From his character also there is a teaching. And that is the main subject of this letter. Because Karna's role is directly related with the current state of affairs in our Marga. More specifically, some innocent margiis and wts are following in Karna's fateful footsteps, in so far that they think they are doing something dharmic and great, but in reality they are being naive & simple. More about this will be said very soon.
To begin then, through Karna, Lord Krsna wanted to show the people that even if one is a devotee and of superlative character, still if one follows the defective approach of simple morality, then they will bring destruction and disaster into their life. This is what Lord Krsna wanted to teach to the inhabitants of this earth, long, long ago. Unfortunately, here we are 3500 years later, and still Lord Krsna's divine guideline & warning about simple morality has yet to be learned. Still Karna's defective approach of simple morality is haunting the general society-- as well as our own AMPS. Once again then, let us all take a pointed look at how Lord Krsna designed the role of Karna in the Mahabharat so that, once and for all, His special teaching about simple morality can be understood and assimilated by all.
It is well known, that the standard of intellect of the people in that ancient era of the Mahabharat was not so high and for the most part the people were innocent and pious. In their heart they were simple moralists. Baba says, "So many examples of simple morality can be cited in the age of the Maha'bha'rata. It was taken to be so natural by the people. There was no question of anything written at the time of taking loans, etc. Moreover, literate people were few and far between. The sun and the moon were working as witnesses and people were free in their transactions." (Disc MHB, p.46) So in their regular way, the people of that era were inclined towards the ways of simple morality-- not spiritual morality. And with no one was this more evident than with Karna, for he was stellar in all he did. Baba says, "Karna attached much importance to simple morality, but lacked in spiritual morality...Karna possessed simple morality, which was static whereas the Pandavas were armed with spiritual morality." (Disc MHB, p.60-61) So Karna was deeply engrossed in simple morality and it was this simple morality which led the well-intentioned Karna into so much trouble and ultimately led to his fall. Because we all know that due to his strict adherence to simple morality, the pious Karna remained loyal to the wicked Duryodhana, and by this way Karna met his unfortunate fate. Let us not forget that at this very moment a few margiis & wts are doing very similar things to what Karna did. And later on in this email this point will be discussed further. Because all should be alerted and forewarned.
Before recounting the details of the Mahabharat & Karna's tragic fall, which many of you are already familiar with, let us remember that this is highly related with the ways of some naive margiis & wts. To begin then, first let us recall that Baba Himself states that except for one flaw, Karna was the top-most person in the entire Mahabharat. That is to say, Karna had more virtue than any of the other heroes, including the Pandavas. He was noble, brave, intelligent, courageous, valiant, plus he was an ardent devotee of Lord Krsna. So, in the entire Mahabharat, Karna was of the best character-- second to none. This is Baba's explicit guideline from His Hindi discourse. Baba says 'if anyone searches the entire Mahabharat, they will not find any other person like Karna; he is unparalleled in all respects-- except that he has only one flaw'. This is a transcription about Karna from Baba's special discourse. And that is the way Lord Krsna planned it also. Because Sri Krsna wanted to put forth the idea to the society that even though Karna was unparalleled in all respects, still because of this one defect of following simple morality, Karna lost everything and met his tragic end. This concept Lord Krsna wanted to teach to all, but many are not learning this point. That is why some are suffering still today from this same problem of simple morality. And what to say about the general society, this is going on in our Marga. Here the key point is that none of Karna's superlative characteristics could save him from the fate of simple morality. That is the special teaching Krsna has given through the role of Karna. So no devotee should ever follow simple morality, otherwise they will face an untimely downfall, just like Karna. Yet in our Marga we see this very thing happening-- on a daily basis.
Of course we all know the story of the Mahabharat, but for the sake of review it should be said that Karna was the chief ally and loyal friend of the evil-minded Duryodhana. What Duryodhana wanted Karna did. Because Karna thought that since Duryodhana had befriended him then he (Karna) should do anything and everything to please his Duryodhana-- no matter what the cost. And these same things some margiis & wts are doing and by that way they are falling into groupism and later on more will be said about this. Here then is that point about Karna. Baba says, "He [Karna] was the most trusted friend of the Kaoravas. He has some striking points of similarity with Bhisma; for example, if someone did some service to him, he [Karna] always remained faithful to him. He followed a code of simple morality." (Disc MHB, p.55) Tragically then, due to his defective way of simple morality, Karna placed his so-called sacred friendship with the lustful Duryodhana above everything else in life. Karna had every opportunity to know that Duryodhana was totally wrong & wicked, but even then Karna embraced him and supported him fully-- 100%. He could not bring himself to do anything else. Why was Karna doing like this-- because he was simple and kind-hearted. He was thinking that what he was doing the right thing. Because earlier Duryodhana saved him so the good-natured Karna thought, 'I should feel gratitude towards Duryodhana and be faithful to him-- that is my true dharma'. That is how Karna was thinking in his simple mind and he held steadfast to that belief.
Nowadays in our Marga, similar things are happening. Some simple and naive margiis & wts-- in their innocent outlook-- they think they are supporting the right person or party etc, but in their confusion they end up supporting dogma or wrong things. So just as Karna had no idea that he was doing anything wrong, same is the case with the margiis. Karna was strongly feeling that what he believed in was dharmic. And he had the requisite force & strength of mind to follow natural morality. So when Karna gave his word he followed through accordingly. Whatever vow he took, he completed. So Karna was very strong. And with that strength and innocence, he remained ever loyal to Duryodhana. And similar is the case with various margiis. They have so many good qualities and they want to do what is right, but in their simplicity they fall into the wrong thing. Just like Karna did.
Here we should remember that Karna was not just some ordinary person. He was great in many respects plus Karna was a devotee of Lord Krsna. And he understood well that Lord Krsna was Taraka Brahma. Proof being that he was repeating Krsna's name at his fateful end. Baba says, "He [Karna] breathed his last with Krs'n'a's name on his lips." (Disc MHB) So Karna was a great devotee-- but even then for the sake of his friendship with the lustful Duryodhana, due to his simple morality, Karna fought against Lord Krsna and the Pandavas. This is the indisputable history. Such is the vileness of simple morality-- it takes a man, even a great man, away from dharma, away from his Ista-- away from Parama Purusa. This is Lord Krsna's graphic demonstration and divine teaching: Not at any cost then should one follow simple morality. Unfortunately some in our Marga are doing the same thing and later on we will discuss this point in greater detail-- with examples.
To continue then with the Mahabharata, we can say further that due to his unfortunate approach of simple morality, Karna never even tried to steer Duryodhana away from his anti-social and mean-minded ways. Karna obediently supported Duryodhana from start to finish-- all because of his kind-hearted nature, gratitude towards Duryodhana, and strict adherence to simple morality. Baba says, "As Bhisma, the grandfather, had accepted the food and drink of the Kaoravas, he continued to support them [Duryodhana and the Kaoravas]. Of course he tried in his own way to change the attitude of Duryodhana, but he didn't exert pressure on him. Karna did not even try to change Duryodhana's attitude, much less exert pressure on him." Disc MHB, p.56) So although both Bhiisma and Karna were two tragic victims of the inherently defective ways of simple morality, Karna was the worse of the two as he never even attempted to bring Duryodhana on the proper path. Not once did Karna try to do this. Reason being that he felt that he owed his life to Duryodhana and that it was his dharma to show gratitude towards Duryodhana. And that very gratitude took the shape of Karna remaining 100% loyal to Duryodhana-- irregardless of what Duryodhana did.
In various ways, in their kindness and innocence, a few margiis and wts are quite similar to Karna. Please read these following case studies and examples and the judge for yourself. 1. Some margiis & wts feel sentimentally close with those in Tiljala so they think Mahaprayan is okay; or others think that because they were born in Bihar so they must support the Bihari faction; or still more think that since they were born in Chattisgarh so they must support Vandanananda and Parmeshvarananda etc. 2. Then there are others who think that, 'Since Sarvatmananda helped get me out of jail so I must support whatever he does-- that is my dharma'. 3. Still others think that, 'Since Sarvatmananda is printing some books then I should support him. And even if Sarvatmananda infuses various dogmas it is ok, why should I oppose him'. 4. Some say that, 'Rudrananda gave me my family acaryaship so then how can I go against him. Rather in the public eye I must speak favourably on his behalf'. 5. Then others recall that, 'Sarvatmananda gave me my avadhuta diiksa then how can I ever forget that-- I must repay him. So what Sarvatmananda is doing is fine'. 6. Plus there are a few who simply think that, 'This or that Dada and I are friends. He stayed at my house many times and we ate food together. Thus I must take his side'.
Here are more things that some simple and innocent margiis and wts are doing... 7. Some reason that, 'I got my first overseas posting when so & so was GS, then I cannot go against him'. 8. Then one or two people think that, 'Rudrananda gave me money to secure my financial situation so I cannot go against him even if he expels the whole universe from AMPS.' 9. Others rationalise that, 'Sarvatmananda helped me arrange my daughter's marriage, and he will withdraw his support for the marriage if I point him out about the fake BP manual. So let BP rights go to hell. I do not care about that. I want for my daughter to get married. I do not care about the distortion done to the AM Revolution discourse'. 10. Still more think along the lines of Bhiisma that, 'I am old and aged so if I struggle against the rulers they will toss me out of my house and banish me to the jungle. So let them do what they like, I do not care. I cannot go against them because then they will create problems for me'. 11. Then there a few wts who fail to speak out about injustices because they do not want to lose their Master Unit-- where they have their own private ashram. So in order to ensure that they do not get transferred from the cozy MU, they became cowardly and sheep-like towards those ruling factional heads. 12. Then one or two margiis or wts just very mildly oppose the ways of groupism-- just like Bhiisma did. But more than that they are unwilling to do for various reasons etc. All these above scenarios fall within the confines of simple morality, and this is not good. To understand more about this let us examine how Baba has critiqued and pointed out the defect of Karna's stance. Because as we all remember, the sentimental Karna was dedicated and completely loyal to the evil-minded Duryodhana. By studying this then some margiis can also learn what is to be done.
Baba guides us that the kind-hearted Karna should have approached Duryodhana and said: 'Oh my dear friend Duryodhana. You have been so generous to me. You have given me everything. You have single-handedly resurrected my life and given me a place in this world when all others neglected me. You are my ever faithful friend and companion. For this reason-- with all due reverence and respect-- I must advise you NOT to pursue your unrighteous ways. That will not be good for you. Please listen to me. You are such a fine King and your reputation will be ever pristine if you adhere to the path of goodness and help others. Please, please I will help you-- come with me and abide by dharma'. This is what Karna should have done, according to Baba. Similarly those margiis who got favours from groupist Dadas should show their gratitude by bringing those Dadas onto the proper path-- otherwise they will become just like Karna. Unfortunately because Karna got food, shelter, and "friendship" from Duryodhana, Karna became sentimental and in his ways of simple morality he thought that, 'Since Duryodhana helped me on my bad days, how can I go against him. Rather I must follow whatever he says'. By this way the heroic Karna thought he was properly expressing his gratitude towards Karna. When actually he was doing harm and committing sin. Unfortunately a few margiis and wts are falling into this same problem-- due to their innocence.
This whole situation is just like if one robber fed one citizen who had no food, then to show their gratitude it does not mean that that one good citizen should join that robber's gang and commit various crimes etc. That is not the proper way to express one's gratitude & thankfulness. Better is to convince that robber that what he is sinful and bring him on right path. That will be the real expression of gratitude. So that is what Karna should have done 3500 years ago and that is what some margiis and wts should do in this present moment.
But this type of thing Karna did not do: Karna did not try to correct Duryodhana's sinful behaviour by bringing him to the proper path. Although that would have truly helped Duryodhana, Karna never thought to express his gratitude in that way. Instead, out of his simplicity and kind-heartedness, Karna adhered to the code of simple morality and remained 100% faithful and totally subservient to Duryodhana's negative ways. Due to this defect of simple morality, Karna could not part from his friend nor guide him properly. Yet here Baba guides us that those armed with spiritual morality will always follow the path of righteousness and try to bring others along on that path. And if after trying again and again and still they cannot convince them to adopt the path of righteousness, then at least they themselves must adopt that path. Baba says, "Strict adherence to spiritual morality may lead to the parting of friends." (Disc MHB, p.56) So Baba says that by following spiritual morality one will always adhere to dharma and that may lead to the parting from their "friend". But due to his flaw of simple morality, this much the fateful Karna could not do. And this led to his tragic and unfortunate fall. Everyone knows well what happened to him in the end...
Keeping Karna's entire situation in mind, everyone should take the time to evaluate their own stance. For example, if one is still supporting the Sarvatmanandas or Rudranandas or the Citkrsnanandas or any groupist ananda, because that Dada did a favour for you in the past, then one should think twice. And one should express their gratitude and indebtedness by bringing that Dada onto the proper path. Failing that, at least one should save themselves and come onto the proper path. None should continue to fall into the hole of groupism etc due to their adherence to simple morality. None should remain faithful to those factional leaders in order to express "gratitude" towards them. None of this will bear any fruit-- rather it will bring about one's fall, just like Karna. So now is the time everyone should think and review-- lest they meet a similarly tragic & unnecessary end.
By Baba's grace-- armed with spiritual morality, not simple morality-- all should follow His path and not the ways of any groupist leader and then one will be firmly grounded in victory and sit on His divine lap. Baba says, "'Where there is dharma there is Is't'a, and where there is Is't'a there is victory'... Intelligent people who move firmly along the path of dharma and sit on the lap of Is't'a are destined to be victorious." (SS-12) Namaskar, Pramod
In their earnestness, people do so many things and all along they feel that what they are doing is dharmic. Because in their simple outlook they think what they are doing seems justified-- even if their action is something totally outlandish. For example, take the case of idol worshippers. They do not feel that what they are doing is utterly sinful. With full emotion and heart-felt feeling they surrender their everything to that piece of stone. They do not realise that what they are doing is mahapapa (great sin). Similarly those militant Muslims who injure and kill non-Muslims feel that what they are doing is right. They feel they are carrying out Allah's command. They do not think that what they are doing is 100% adharmic and sinful. Likewise with regards to the recent shooting of Dada Jinandiipananda in AN, whoever the shooter was he felt that what he was doing was right. Similar is the case with the deadly attack on Abhipremananda. Those simple Dadas who killed him thought that they were upholding the flag of dharma. They did not think they created a mortal sin. Here the point is that various people do things that are totally wrong but in their own mind the action is perfectly justified. Take one more example: Some incur the sin of pratyavaya by not doing what they should do. For instance, one should oppose injustices and wrongdoings etc and if they fail to oppose those wrongdoings that is pratyavaya, which is worse than papa. Unfortunately at this very moment there is one high-profile Didi sitting on her MU in Brazil, Africa, or the North pole and she is thinking, 'Let AMPS go in hell-- I will not oppose any groupist camp. Rather I will establish my position where I am. But I will not oppose those destroying our Marga by their groupist ways. Rather I will keep quiet and attend to my own endeavor.' This is the way one Didi is thinking. And by that way she is doing pratyavaya-- committing terrible sin by not dong what is dharma and right. But in her mind she feels that she is correct & justified. And a few others mistakenly support her by thinking that hers is the right path. When in fact hers is the sinful path-- the way of pratyavaya. And this is all related with the above posting. Because due to simple morality or other defective outlooks, people justify actions and events in their own mind which ultimately pull them far from the right path. So about this, everyone in AM should be careful since our goal is to reach unto the Divine stance and not any other place.
************************************** Capacity of A'tma
Baba says, "Till you have a human body go on doing great work. After death in absence of the brain the mind cannot function in which case one cannot do anything. But the unit consciousness (atma) can still work. It has the capacity to work in subtle form." (Delhi DMC 1984 Discourse)

Policy on Comments

Spam and unparliamentary language not to be used.

folders: Ananda Marga related articles on hundreds of niche issues


To receive postings of this blog, email us at:

Baba nam kevalam