To: am-global@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Devashish Book: Misinformation
Date: 14 Dec 2011 21:09:44 +0530
Baba
"Sa'r'a' yadi na'i va' dile prabhu, a'mi toma'y d'eke ya'bo..." (PS 1813)
Purport:
Baba whether You choose to respond or not, but I will go on calling You through my kiirtan, sadhana, and dhya'na. To go on calling You is my duty-- it is my work. And by this way I will also be able to know what work You have.
Baba, the rush of the restless breeze and the humming of the swaying trees in the forest go on calling You always. Do You reply to their call or not? I will ask them secretly about this.
Baba, with deep yearning and longing, devotees make their garlands for You-- in the burning heat of the flame and in the cold chill of the fog. Baba, are you understanding their pain and suffering. If You do not understand then with the heartfelt composition of a song, I will explain their feelings to You.
O' my dearmost Baba, I will call out to You again and again, please grace me by giving a response...
I agree wholeheartedly - there is no question of Baba ever ordering to ban or burn the book, "A Discussion". Baba never did like this and indeed many of us have this publication, "A Discussion", on our bookshelf.
So what Devashish has written in his book, Anandamurti: The Jamalpur Years, is totally false. Devashish's assessment is completely incorrect.
Here is further evidence that Baba did not ban or burn this book. Baba Himself ordered that this book - "A Discussion" - be republished and titled as "Discourses on Prout" and placed in the Prout Nutshell Series.
It only stands to reason then that if Baba gave the order to ban and burn the book - "A Discussion" - then He would have given the order to ban and burn "Discourses on Prout." But that He did not do. Rather He purposely ordered that it be included and published in His Prout in a Nutshell series.
So to think that Baba would have banned a book, burned it, and then republished it all over again under a separate title is absolutely ludicrous. Baba would not do like and and indeed Baba did not do like this. Baba never gave the order to ban and burn "A Discussion" - rather He wants that the ideas presented in this book be shared with one and all. Everyone should read this book.
So it seems brother Devashish needs to be a little more careful with His "facts" before publishing a book, Anandamurti: The Jamalpur Years, and distributing it all over the world for all to see. I sincerely question what other misnomers and falsehoods may in this book. I think there may be many.
Namaskar,
Omprakash
Here is the only difference between "Discourses on Prout" and "A Discussion."
In His book, "A Discussion" there is a short 11 or 12 line section on page 23 where Baba lists the 7 stages of physical revolution. This very brief listing is not printed in "Discourses on Prout." Other than this 1/2 page section, the two books "A Discussion" and "Discourses on Prout" are exactly the same.
Regardless, in no way did Baba ever declare that the book should be "banned" or "burned."
On 12/14/2011 11:34 AM, AM-GLOBAL wrote:
Date: 14 Dec 2011 11:58:23 -0000
From: "Vidya_Deva@Pendulum...."
To: am-global@earthlink.net
Subject: Devashish Book: "Half Truth"
Baba
== DEVASHISH BOOK: "HALF-TRUTH" ==
Namaskar,
It is common human nature to trust what is in print to be correct. We assume the writer, editor and publisher have verified the accuracy of each and every word.
Though, this type of feeling is often exploited as well - dogmas and wrong ideas are also put in print and taken as true. This misguides both readers and the general society.
Unfortunately, Devashish's book - Anandamurti: The Jamalpur Years - falls in this latter category. It is very laced with countless errors and mistakes that lead the reader astray.
Every concerned Ananda Margii then should be aware of brother Devashish's recent publication, Anandamurti: The Jamalpur Years (2010). Indeed, this book demands a closer look by our entire Marga family.